Re designated inside the FEM, 20 30 harm Harm Kind Damage Case No. Damage

Re designated inside the FEM, 20 30 harm Harm Kind Damage Case No. Damage BI-0115 Biological Activity Hanger No. Damage Degree Single attributed to cable failure. Table 1 lists all the damage conditions investigated in DC 4 N3 ten 20 30 cases are hanger DC 10 20 30 the FEM. failure DC 7 1 N4 N2 10 20 30 DC 4 N3 10 20 30 Single hanger DC 102 N5 N4 10 20 30 DC 7 ten 20 30 failure Table 1. Eighteen damage DC 135 simulated by FEM. N4 situations Double hanger N2 and N5 ten 20 30 DC 102 10 20 30 DC 135 N2 and 10 30 Double hanger failure DC 168 No. Harm Hanger N4 N3 and N7 No. 10 20 Degree Damage Sort Harm Case Damage20 30failure DC 168 N3 and N7 10 20 30Deflection alter at the anchorage pointDC 1 N2 10 20 30 The harm of Single hanger a single single hanger plus the simultaneous harm of two hangers have been DC 4 N3 ten 20 30 simulated. The damage situation can anddivided N4 two categories. DC1 C12 will be the into the damage of 1 single 7 hanger be the simultaneous damage of two hangers have been failure DC ten 20 30 1st Hydroxyflutamide Epigenetic Reader Domain category, which belongs to thecan be divided into two categories. DC1 C12 is definitely the simulated. The harm condition 1 single hanger damaged at a time; DC13 C18 is DC 102 N5 ten 20 30 the second category, consideringthe one particular single hanger damaged at a time; DC13 C18 is very first category, which belongs to the harm of two hangers simultaneously. Double hanger DC 135 N2 and N4 ten 20 30 Within the category, taking into consideration complete two hangers simultaneously. the second finite element model, the damage ofdamage of each hanger (that is certainly, the cable failure DC 168 N3 and N7 ten 20 30 force Within the finite element model, the full damagethe each and every hanger (that’s, the cable reduction ratio is 100 ) is simulated by deleting of damaged hanger. The deflecforce reduction ratio is definitely the total damage of every the broken hanger. The deflection tion distinction between100 ) is simulated by deleting hanger as well as the healthier state could be The damage of one particular single hanger and of simultaneous harm of two hangers had been distinction amongst the total harm theeach hanger and influence matrix is usually obtained in the model. Consequently, the deflection difference the healthy state might be simulated. The damage condition might be deflection the obtained from the model. Consequently, the divided into two categories. DC1 C12 is be obtained, and also the result is plotted in Figure four. It may be distinction Figure 4 that when every single observed from influence matrix can first category,the outcome is plotted in Figure 4. It hanger seen from at a time; DC13 C18 is which belongs to the 1 single could be broken Figure 4 that when each obtained, and hanger is totally broken separately, the deflection difference vector will attain a the second of two hangers simultaneously. hanger is atcategory, contemplating the damagedeflection distinction vector will reach a clear clear peakcompletely damaged separately, the damage occurs inside the symmetrical position, the broken hanger. When the Inside the broken hanger. When the harm happens within the symmetrical position, the the finite element model, the full damage of every hanger (which is, the cable peak in the deflection distinction vector can also be symmetrical. force reduction ratio is one hundred ) is simulated by deflection difference vector can also be symmetrical.deleting the damaged hanger. The deflection difference amongst the comprehensive damage of each and every hanger along with the healthy state may be obtained in the model. Because of this, the deflection distinction influe.